Published and Forthcoming Papers:
Taking Over the Size Effect: Asset Pricing Implications of Merger Activity
with Jeffry Netter, Bradley Paye, and Michael Stegemoller
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, March 2024, vol. 59, no. 2, pp.690-726.
Abstract: We show that merger announcement returns account for virtually all of the measured size premium. An empirical proxy for ex ante takeover exposure positively and robustly relates to cross-sectional expected returns. The relation between size and expected returns becomes positive or insignificant, rather than negative, conditional on this takeover characteristic. Asset pricing models that include a factor based on the takeover characteristic outperform otherwise similar models that include the conventional size factor. We conclude that the takeover factor should replace the conventional size factor in benchmark asset pricing models.
Presentations: Aarhus University, University of Washington Summer Finance Conference (2022), Virginia Tech, Washington and Lee University
Working Papers:
Do Investors Have Data Blind Spots? The Role of Data Vendors in Capital Markets
Updated: May 2026
Solo-Authored
Awards: Best Paper in Empirical Finance (SFA 2024)
Abstract: Financial data vendors' database design choices affect institutional investor demand. Using Standard & Poor's ('S&P') Compustat database, I show that institutional investment in firms with missing Compustat data is 30% below the mean. A quasi-natural experiment confirms a plausibly causal connection: A technology improvement at S&P causes a discrete reduction in missing data, leading to a rise in investment for the subset of treated firms. Missing data ultimately relates to both firm valuations and price efficiency via its impact on demand. I conclude that data vendors’ actions can materially impact capital markets because they affect firms' access to institutional capital.
Presentations: SFS Cavalcade North America (2024), Northern Finance Association Conference (2024), Financial Management Association Conference (2024), Southern Finance Association Conference (2024), Eastern Finance Association Conference (2025), Arizona State University, Georgia Tech, Iowa State University, Louisiana State University, Miami University, Texas Christian University, Tulane University, University of Arizona, University of Missouri, University of Oklahoma, Virginia Tech
Previously Titled: Information Intermediaries and the Distorting Effect of Incomplete Data
High (on) Sharpe Ratios? Assessing the Performance of Data-Instigated Factor Models
Updated: Dec 2025
with Bradley Paye
Abstract: Estimates of maximum Sharpe ratios for popular multifactor asset pricing models seem too large to be consistent with risk-based explanations. We show that this “Sharpe ratio puzzle” can be explained by accounting for the influence of historical data on factor selection. From a methodological perspective, we demonstrate that commonly used out-of-sample model assessment approaches are prone to optimistic bias because evaluation samples overlap with data analyzed in prior return anomaly studies. We instead measure model performance using validation samples that plausibly did not influence model specification. Empirically, this approach substantially reduces estimates of maximum Sharpe ratios across a wide range of multifactor models, thereby resolving the Sharpe ratio puzzle.
Presentations: Financial Management Association Conference (2023), Portuguese Finance Network Conference (2023), Financial Management Association European Conference (2023), University of North Carolina at Charlotte, University of North Texas, University of Virginia, Virginia Tech
with Andrea Rossi, Jason Sandvik, and Chenyanzi Yu
Abstract: In a sample of nearly 8,500 reports by professional investment analysts, we document that female fund managers are judged more negatively than otherwise comparable male managers. The gap spans overall recommendations, team evaluations, and written commentary sentiment, with differences of up to one-third of a standard deviation. These differences are not explained by managers’ tenure, experience, personal investment in the fund, or past performance. The gap is also inconsistent with accurate statistical discrimination, since female managers perform in line with others along the very performance metrics that the reports are designed to predict. We find no comparable differences in assessments based on managers’ race or ethnicity. Because these reports influence investors’ money flows, differential assessments may help explain why female fund managers receive lower flows and are paid less.
Presentations: Arizona State University, Eller College Interdisciplinary Research Symposium, Haskell & White Corporate Reporting and Governance Conference (2026), Junior Faculty Mentoring Program at AFA Meeting (2027, scheduled), Monash University, University of Arizona, University of Melbourne
Works In Progress:
Financial Data Intermediaries and the (Mis-)Measurement of Firm Profitability
with Bradley Paye and Marshall Vance
Supported by the Pamplin Duo+ Seed Grant (2025)
Presentations: Virginia Tech
The Time View of Asset Pricing
with Ngoc-Khanh Tran
Presentations: Virginia Tech
Data Guides:
A brief description of data availability in CRSP.